The Definitive Guide to contract act pakistan case law
The Definitive Guide to contract act pakistan case law
Blog Article
5. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for your complainant further argued that during the investigation on the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to the recovery of sleeping drugs on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been created before the Court wherein the sleeping supplements were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected from the liver although not from the stomach. That's why, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of the motorcycle.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in pick circuit courts. Cases can be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
record of the department there is not any record obtainable whatsoever regarding promotion in the petitioner(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a effectively-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Petitioner owning been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular along with a 50 percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner could avoid standing trial and hence delay the prosecution on the case. The material on record makes the case of your petitioner falls under two exceptions towards the rule of grant of bail as mentioned higher than.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
acquitted the appellants from all of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report on the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the most important tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to accomplish, i.e. secure its citizens.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi get more info The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation aren't entertainable for that reasons that these types of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as a result this petition is dismissed, which involves disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is just not in a position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.